While this is good math, it's a bad plan. Because the price of what we buy is compounding at the same time. Looking at the investment side without the spending side is false comfort. I bought a house for $47k. I bought a new mountain bike for under $200. What's the point of being a millionaire when your new 74 speed cassette costs $300 thousand?tax deferment on trades, and a penalty if you get an urge to buy a boat when the market is up figuring it is going to the moon.
so your $120k becomes $60k and the market tanks and now it is $45k....and the value of the boat goes to $30k, if someone will buy it.
at 7% it doubles every 10 years.
at 10% is doubles every 7 years.
Rule of 72..
there area 40 investing years @ 7%, starting with $60k could make it...
I did the math somewhere else, I think it is $100/week starting at 20 yo
Using $400/month to make it easier. (i could have done it $4800/year.. but it would be quite a bit less cause of the slower compounding)
F = P * ([1 + I]^N - 1 )/I
7% is .07/12 - monthly rate .0058333
40 years * 12 per year = 480
400 * ([1.006]^480-1)/.006 = $1,110,775
At @clarkenstein or @thegock (please check the formula - i think this is the future value of a stream of equal payments.)
While this is good math, it's a bad plan. Because the price of what we buy is compounding at the same time. Looking at the investment side without the spending side is false comfort. I bought a house for $47k. I bought a new mountain bike for under $200. What's the point of being a millionaire when your new 74 speed cassette costs $300 thousand?
I have a feeling the way DXY is going that a million will go much further than it has the last 20 years. Did you see Credit Suisse is on the brink of collapse? Thanks to their CDRs.Too bad it takes more than a million to retire these days.
You’re also assuming we can resume the upward inflationary spiral. Today’s news show deflation coming soon and not much mr powell can do about it.While this is good math, it's a bad plan. Because the price of what we buy is compounding at the same time. Looking at the investment side without the spending side is false comfort. I bought a house for $47k. I bought a new mountain bike for under $200. What's the point of being a millionaire when your new 74 speed cassette costs $300 thousand?
While this is good math, it's a bad plan. Because the price of what we buy is compounding at the same time. Looking at the investment side without the spending side is false comfort. I bought a house for $47k. I bought a new mountain bike for under $200. What's the point of being a millionaire when your new 74 speed cassette costs $300 thousand?
Imagine how well off everyone would be if financial advisors used the 8% stop loss rule on any investments they manage? We wouldn't need our accounts to draw down 25% as they are now. They could actually earn us a real return. Financial advisors are pretty much over paid college debt recipients.The only thing thesr numbers prove is to stay the course. Nobody can predict which investment will win over a lifetime. Gold? Stocks? Real estate?
Play the portfolio and take the average over the long term. I don't think the goal is to be cash flow negative in retirement? Maybe some discipline, but mostly life unchanged.
Imagine how well off everyone would be if financial advisors used the 8% stop loss rule on any investments they manage? We wouldn't need our accounts to draw down 25% as they are now. They could actually earn us a real return. Financial advisors are pretty much over paid college debt recipients
No, an 8% stop. You can do a trailing stop too but more likely to get stopped out on that stock/etf you love. A good rule of thumb is never lose 8% on one position and you will do great. Let's say it's Feb of 2021 and you really want to own ARKK because Cathie Woods is the best and she's going to the moon with Bitcoin so you buy in on a slight pullback week later at $150. Got it, set you stop at 8% and you are good. Now boom, you get stopped out a couple days later at $138. Now the stop continues it's down fall all the way to $35.10. Do you really want to hold that bag until it's worth break even at $150? It will be years and that money can do so much more elsewhere. Same can be said for any small or. madcap over the last 1.5 years. I still don't think that stuff is done going down...not until AAPL and TSLA fail. Just remember, a good stock is only a good stock when it's going up.I suspect you mean a trailing stop?
consider that you like the stock - when do you get back in? when it returns to down 5% and seems on its way up?
3% was lost because it looked bad on paper...nobody can call the bottom.
what was the money doing while it was out?
Some people need a financial advisor just to tell them to keep saving - retirement, college savings, etc....
Others aren't good at the paperwork - and for good reason. It sucks.
Like paying a coach to tell you to do intervals - you know you need to do intervals.
Saying you are going to do them to someone ups the commitment ???
i really vacillate on the subject.
While this is good math, it's a bad plan. Because the price of what we buy is compounding at the same time. Looking at the investment side without the spending side is false comfort. I bought a house for $47k. I bought a new mountain bike for under $200. What's the point of being a millionaire when your new 74 speed cassette costs $300 thousand?
He may not be wrong on the grand scheme but you are right on the individual level. If you boost you local economy your homes, quality of life, schools, parks etc will all be more valuable and at the end of the day your net worth. Unfortunately you individually will not be able to do it.I like this because it highlights behavior... behavior we share. My one buddy said i “should” be feeding into the local market more... silly. Thats what we have the other 80% for
No, an 8% stop. You can do a trailing stop too but more likely to get stopped out on that stock/etf you love. A good rule of thumb is never lose 8% on one position and you will do great. Let's say it's Feb of 2021 and you really want to own ARKK because Cathie Woods is the best and she's going to the moon with Bitcoin so you buy in on a slight pullback week later at $150. Got it, set you stop at 8% and you are good. Now boom, you get stopped out a couple days later at $138. Now the stop continues it's down fall all the way to $35.10. Do you really want to hold that bag until it's worth break even at $150? It will be years and that money can do so much more elsewhere. Same can be said for any small or. madcap over the last 1.5 years. I still don't think that stuff is done going down...not until AAPL and TSLA fail. Just remember, a good stock is only a good stock when it's going up.
I read that article last night and not sure if it's a piece aimed at getting rational people angry, or aimed at people bad with money justifying their beliefs.
I'm going with the rationalization of their bad money habits.I read that article last night and not sure if it's a piece aimed at getting rational people angry, or aimed at people bad with money justifying their beliefs.
The whole gist of the theory is that you want to keep a consistent standard of living throughout your life which I believe is absolute bullshit. If anything you should aim for a standard of living that is slowly going up as you age.
For instance unlike what that article says I should have done, I enjoyed my 20s/30s while driving shitbox cars, not blowing crazy money on expensive vacations, housing, clothes etc. So as I've gotten older and added in more "luxury" like a generic hotel instead of campsites, or a brand new but under 20k car, my standard of living slowly improves yet I have a good financial outlook.
Fucking guy is nuts, the only reason my retirement savings looks the way it does, is because I started early.I read that article last night and not sure if it's a piece aimed at getting rational people angry, or aimed at people bad with money justifying their beliefs.
The whole gist of the theory is that you want to keep a consistent standard of living throughout your life which I believe is absolute bullshit. If anything you should aim for a standard of living that is slowly going up as you age.
I'm pretty sure all my nephew and nieces live in CC debt. They are always traveling, ubers left and right. And they travel in style, I can't figure it out. they are all in their late 20's and early 30's. I have one niece who spends $15 every day on the way into to work at starbucks? Vegas, St Barts, Cancun, for bachelor or bachelorette party. Crazy stuff.it doesn't make a lot of sense to save if amassing interest debt ???
my SIL looks at money as a stream - she is retired - she has money, but won't pay her cc bill in full
if it is over her monthly allotment, so it starts accumulating interest debt.
Even if she reels in the spending on new things, the interest now dominates the equation -
but that is fine, cause she can afford the minimum payment(s) - so paying 15% while earning 5% ... :throw hands up:
Well according to Google anyway, the average American has over $6000 in CC debt. Your SIL is not alone.it doesn't make a lot of sense to save if amassing interest debt ???
my SIL looks at money as a stream - she is retired - she has money, but won't pay her cc bill in full
if it is over her monthly allotment, so it starts accumulating interest debt.
Even if she reels in the spending on new things, the interest now dominates the equation -
but that is fine, cause she can afford the minimum payment(s) - so paying 15% while earning 5% ... :throw hands up: