Because I went almost a year and half without a vaccine, had constant exposure, and somehow managed to not get it again, nor give it to anyone in my family; couple that with ZERO liability to the manufacturer/provider/employer/entity mandating it, along with an arduous (I'm being kind) process for a claim of injury (yes, they are real, and severely underreported), well I think that's a reason for a conversation. Where there is risk, there must also be choice; the mandates are coercion. Big difference, and it's open to a wonderfully complex ethical debate, something we still haven't seen happen.
Looked at another way, my immunity against covid was fine when there wasn't a vaccine; I wasn't asked to test, nor was I quarantined for exposure. Fast forward, I'm a danger to my patients in September if I'm not vaccinated, so I will be fired. I get the vaccine, everything is supposed to be ok, but wait, now if I have a positive test, I have to quarantine for 5 days (not 10-14 anymore, because I'm "essential"). If I'm asymptomatic though, I can go right back to treating patients. But NOW you also 'need' a booster (that whole titer checking we've done for 40+ years for previous vaccinations no longer is scientific I guess). So tell me again why am I mandated to get a vaccine/booster because I work in healthcare?
Let's also keep in mind that the Cleveland Clinic looked at this almost a year ago, and came to the conclusion that there was little benefit in vaccinating their employees who recovered from covid. Those of us who recovered from covid after acquiring it in the service of helping others should be lauded for taking the hit, not punished for it, and that's what these capricious, unscientific edicts are, a punishment put forth by ignorant, fearful people.