rlb
Well-Known Member
Edit: got my east and west confused. Good thing I don't make maps for a living.
Of what I rode, 85% is in good shape. As noted above, there are a bunch of scattered atypical wet spots. And the typical wet spots are still larger than usual. I would ride this loop again, with the exception of the eastern yellow downhill. The middle downhill has a big wet section just above the 4-way, but is otherwise good. The double-track section of pink was also a mess that I should have avoided. I was surprised that the area behind the ballfields (sans the trail off Gilbride where I turned around) was in good shape. Based on what I saw, I did not bother with red or blue.
I'll let the bike pic tell the rest of the story.
Of what I rode, 85% is in good shape. As noted above, there are a bunch of scattered atypical wet spots. And the typical wet spots are still larger than usual. I would ride this loop again, with the exception of the eastern yellow downhill. The middle downhill has a big wet section just above the 4-way, but is otherwise good. The double-track section of pink was also a mess that I should have avoided. I was surprised that the area behind the ballfields (sans the trail off Gilbride where I turned around) was in good shape. Based on what I saw, I did not bother with red or blue.
I'll let the bike pic tell the rest of the story.
Last edited: