Alternative pov:
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/06/03/dont-make-this-gigantic-social-security-mistake-commentary.html
For the record I haven't decided what I'm going to do yet. Earliest I can start to collect is another 3 years from next month.
in this person's calculation, the break even point was 84, and life expectancy is 85.x - funny how the SSA makes it that close..
It isn't like insurance or investing at all. It is gambling. Die before starting, zero money, Die before break-even, lose.
(yes, i know there is a surviving spouse benefit, but it kicks in either way, and is dependent on their ss $$)
Living to 95, only leaves $150,000
incremental on the table over 10 years - is that worth the gamble?
The only thing i can think of in the insurance world that would come close to this is a deferred annuity with no death benefit, or guaranteed payout of principal.
And nobody buys those, unless you are rich and young. At that point, buy whole or variable life, and keep it under the modified endowment limit (MEC limit) - this is more estate
planning than retirement planning. You borrow back against the insurance contract, the contract pays itself off on death, and the benefit/balance goes to your heirs (tax free, avoids probate).
i'm still on the 'take the $$ while young' wagon. Maximize life rather than $$.(c) yes, i just copyrighted that
😀