The next few years. Does diversity matter?

Yeah, I was mostly joking. Their whole culture is different than the vulture capital types. But that culture can change over time, not with the people at the top now and maybe not with the ones they choose to replace them, but a few lines of succeeding leaders.

Buffet has said multiple times that he has a lot of cash on hand not just because he can't find good businesses to buy at the right price, his cash stockpile is so big there aren't really big companies to buy at that size.

I have no idea what BRK is doing with SXM. with all the satellite mesh networks turning on 5g access, there will be little need for specialized non-military geosync.
maybe the NOAA and Government contracts for delivering weather data? some ADS-B back-up? Redundant broadcasting?
They own their frequency block, so that has some value (maybe $5-10b ?)
I think it is some sort of money thing with his buds over at liberty media. modern SXM radios are connected through the car's 5g link - they downlink the music via satellite, then report what you have selected over the cellular network. maybe the data?
If there isn't already, there will be an ad supported free tier - with targeted ads, kinda like forums 😉
 
I have no idea what BRK is doing with SXM. with all the satellite mesh networks turning on 5g access, there will be little need for specialized non-military geosync.
maybe the NOAA and Government contracts for delivering weather data? some ADS-B back-up? Redundant broadcasting?
They own their frequency block, so that has some value (maybe $5-10b ?)
I think it is some sort of money thing with his buds over at liberty media. modern SXM radios are connected through the car's 5g link - they downlink the music via satellite, then report what you have selected over the cellular network. maybe the data?
If there isn't already, there will be an ad supported free tier - with targeted ads, kinda like forums 😉
There's a spreadsheet somewhere that they used to figure out the valuation.

It could be that they know there's more value in the frequencies than what's on the surface, or maybe there's actually enough money in subscriber fees to keep minor upkeep of the system going? Think of Iridium how it was worthless, until it wasn't.

This could be another S&H Green Stamps for them...
 
There's a spreadsheet somewhere that they used to figure out the valuation.

It could be that they know there's more value in the frequencies than what's on the surface, or maybe there's actually enough money in subscriber fees to keep minor upkeep of the system going? Think of Iridium how it was worthless, until it wasn't.

This could be another S&H Green Stamps for them...
People usually scratch their heads at that one because SiriusXM doesn’t look like a classic “exciting” Berkshire investment on the surface. But through a Buffett/Berkshire lens, it actually makes a lot of sense.

Here’s why Berkshire would still stay deeply involved in SXM 👇


1. Super predictable cash flows (Buffett catnip)​

SiriusXM is basically a subscription toll booth:

  • ~30+ million subscribers
  • Monthly recurring revenue
  • Very low churn
  • Customers are “sticky” once the service is built into the car
That kind of steady, boring, reliable cash generation is exactly what Berkshire loves—even if growth is slow.


2. Capital-light, high free cash flow business​

Once the satellites and infrastructure are in place:

  • Ongoing costs are relatively fixed
  • Marginal cost of new subscribers is tiny
  • Free cash flow stays strong even in weak economic cycles
That free cash flow can be used for buybacks, debt reduction, or dividends, all of which Berkshire values.


3. Built-in moat (even if it’s not flashy)​

SXM’s moat isn’t sexy, but it’s real:

  • Nationwide satellite network
  • Exclusive long-term content deals
  • Deep integration with auto manufacturers
  • Huge switching friction (most people don’t cancel; they just… keep paying)
It’s not easily disrupted overnight, which matters more to Berkshire than hype.


4. Berkshire loves media businesses they understand​

Buffett has repeatedly said he prefers:

  • Simple business models
  • Media and content economics he can grasp
  • Companies with pricing power over time
SXM fits that mold far better than most streaming or tech platforms.


5. Valuation + downside protection​

SiriusXM has often traded at:

  • Low earnings multiples
  • High free cash flow yield
That gives Berkshire:

  • Asymmetric risk (limited downside if cash keeps coming in)
  • Optional upside if buybacks shrink the share count or the business stabilizes longer than expected
Buffett is totally fine owning a “melting ice cube” if it melts slowly and throws off cash the whole time.


6. Berkshire doesn’t need growth—just durability​

This part is key:
Berkshire is so large now that it doesn’t need fast-growing companies. It needs:

  • Durable cash producers
  • Businesses that won’t implode
  • Assets that can quietly compound or fund other investments
SXM fits neatly into that role.


The big picture​

Berkshire isn’t betting that SiriusXM will become the next big thing. They’re betting that:

  • It keeps printing cash
  • Subscribers don’t flee en masse
  • The business lasts longer than people expect
That’s a very Berkshire-style bet.

If you want, I can also break down what risks might finally make Berkshire exit or how this compares to their Apple / Coca-Cola mindset 📉📈
 
People usually scratch their heads at that one because SiriusXM doesn’t look like a classic “exciting” Berkshire investment on the surface. But through a Buffett/Berkshire lens, it actually makes a lot of sense.

Here’s why Berkshire would still stay deeply involved in SXM 👇


1. Super predictable cash flows (Buffett catnip)​

SiriusXM is basically a subscription toll booth:

  • ~30+ million subscribers
  • Monthly recurring revenue
  • Very low churn
  • Customers are “sticky” once the service is built into the car
That kind of steady, boring, reliable cash generation is exactly what Berkshire loves—even if growth is slow.


2. Capital-light, high free cash flow business​

Once the satellites and infrastructure are in place:

  • Ongoing costs are relatively fixed
  • Marginal cost of new subscribers is tiny
  • Free cash flow stays strong even in weak economic cycles
That free cash flow can be used for buybacks, debt reduction, or dividends, all of which Berkshire values.


3. Built-in moat (even if it’s not flashy)​

SXM’s moat isn’t sexy, but it’s real:

  • Nationwide satellite network
  • Exclusive long-term content deals
  • Deep integration with auto manufacturers
  • Huge switching friction (most people don’t cancel; they just… keep paying)
It’s not easily disrupted overnight, which matters more to Berkshire than hype.


4. Berkshire loves media businesses they understand​

Buffett has repeatedly said he prefers:

  • Simple business models
  • Media and content economics he can grasp
  • Companies with pricing power over time
SXM fits that mold far better than most streaming or tech platforms.


5. Valuation + downside protection​

SiriusXM has often traded at:

  • Low earnings multiples
  • High free cash flow yield
That gives Berkshire:

  • Asymmetric risk (limited downside if cash keeps coming in)
  • Optional upside if buybacks shrink the share count or the business stabilizes longer than expected
Buffett is totally fine owning a “melting ice cube” if it melts slowly and throws off cash the whole time.


6. Berkshire doesn’t need growth—just durability​

This part is key:
Berkshire is so large now that it doesn’t need fast-growing companies. It needs:

  • Durable cash producers
  • Businesses that won’t implode
  • Assets that can quietly compound or fund other investments
SXM fits neatly into that role.


The big picture​

Berkshire isn’t betting that SiriusXM will become the next big thing. They’re betting that:

  • It keeps printing cash
  • Subscribers don’t flee en masse
  • The business lasts longer than people expect
That’s a very Berkshire-style bet.

If you want, I can also break down what risks might finally make Berkshire exit or how this compares to their Apple / Coca-Cola mindset 📉📈

Next time ask the AI to make a few spelling mistakes. 😂
 
Back
Top Bottom