@Patrick
I read:
As of Tuesday (March 10), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had tested 3,791 specimens for COVID, while other state and local labs had conducted 7,288 tests,
according to the CDC. It's not clear how that number translates to people tested, however, because some states are running the test twice to confirm the results.
thats a little over 10,000....not exactly alot of people being tested out there. Whats that number 3 days later? 20,000? 30,000?
the only proxy we have is confirmed. not individual tests, or tests administered.
we know the number of people that have it is higher than the number confirmed.
so sure, more tests per day = more confirmed but they are doing more tests because more people need to be tested - not just because the test became available (which is kinda true also)
use 4 days as the time-to-double the cases.
Italy is a couple weeks ahead of us, they added 2,200+ yesterday.
they were at 10,000 - so if nothing changes it will be 20,000 in 3 days.
40,000 4 days after that. but they locked down the country - so look for it flatten
before then.
the biggest challenge is that people think linearly. That is how time goes by,
and mostly how we move around. It isn't a linear problem.
consider moore's law. every 18 months processors double their speed, and memory size
is cut in half. this seems linear when stated, but it is exponential. this is why there are
such bold predictions on AI and autonomous weapons. The logical conclusion is that the weapon will learn to defend itself.