In reflection, better advocates
How so?
In reflection, better advocates
How so?
How so?
Nothing short of 3000 members is even close to acceptable. We have a long way to go. But with more members come more leaders come more volunteers and so on. I think our well is super shallow with the number of members we have and that's what I see as the first step in having a bigger voice in the state
Get ye to bike shops and engage with the ownership. Not an easy task now/even in the past, but consider how many people are exposed to their first mountain bike that way.
Consider getting in on it with Trek, Giant, Specialized, etc, who all mine e-mails from sales. Sure, it's easy for them to lazily slap an IMBA forward on there, but that doesn't help Jorba. As far as selling it: how much more could you ask as a company that wants a repeat customer than to say: their customer is going to be put in direct contact (not 'national level') with people who eat, sleep, and bleed bikes.
I think what he means is that sort of top level view of things. A good manager will say: if my people failed, that is because I did not enable them properly. While that is a very simple view of it, I think/assume this is what he means. Did we (me, you, Norm, and all the people who lead at some level) do enough to enable everyone else to make a difference? I don't know, and I am not arguing that Norm is right or wrong. Just saying that this could be his point.
Or maybe I am wrong.
What I would also say is that as a volunteer org, there is only so much blood you can get from a stone. Speaking for myself as well as you, I have a paying job and a family plus my own fitness to care for. This stuff is somewhat down the chain in terms of how much I/we/you can devote to it. Could we do more? Yes, but at what cost to our personal/professional lives?
Recently I have come to the realization - in part because of something you wrote - that we need to way way WAY increase our numbers. Nothing short of 3000 members is even close to acceptable. We have a long way to go. But with more members come more leaders come more volunteers and so on. I think our well is super shallow with the number of members we have and that's what I see as the first step in having a bigger voice in the state.
Or again, maybe I'm wrong.
There are tons of studies out there regarding success of a non-profit, and compensated staff is always among the greatest impacts. Example: New Jersey has somewhere over 8.8 million people. Vermont has over 600k, or around 7% of NJ's population. JORBA has ~600 members, VMBA has ~7500 members. So JORBA has 8% of VMBA's members, while VT has 7% of NJ's population. How can it be so far off?
I asked the Q before. Why isn’t every Nica kid automatically a member?
Why doesn’t a free membership come with the purchase of a mountain bike?
And looking at VMBA it looks like the base level is $55. No free ride.
IMO, 99% of the obstacle with getting people to part with their money is being able to point out, "We did that (and that. And that. And that. And that)". People are justifiably hesitant to join an organization (or donate) without tangible benefits. I like socks, and jerseys, and Jorbands, and stickers, etc, as much as the next guy, but for those who already volunteer their time/effort, they're not necessary...and--honestly--there's no mention of recurring benefits on the website. I know there are, but someone who isn't a member doesn't.
in reflection, as in my own experience, I haven't been successful with MCPC, NYNJTC, NJDEP...etc.How so?
I will point to this style of argument:
![]()
Reductio ad absurdum - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
The claim to support is that you cannot auto-enroll people into something.
The opposite argument being: why not just auto-enroll the state of NJ into JORBA?
Poof. We now have 8.8 million JORBA members.
And looking at VMBA it looks like the base level is $55. No free ride.
I have asked many a time “where does my money go”?
A free coupon doesn’t do anything but artificially bump up numbers. I know numbers are used to help sell services but still.
I could be a little off with this answer, but I think a good portion of mebership funds goes to insurance, which is not something Jorba wants to use as a selling point, but essential if we want to work on trails. The perceived risk of mountain bikers may be part of the reason NYNJTC is hesitant to advertise their partnership with Jorba.I’ll be honest here, I have been a JORBA member for however long and I have asked many a time “where does my money go”? Tools and other things for TM, that is great and I am grateful for having received some of those but after that...I honestly don’t know.
Paying for the high bridge trails is great too but services we need 10 high bridges to be like “oh wow, Jorba doing something here”
A free coupon doesn’t do anything but artificially bump up numbers. I know numbers are used to help sell services but still.
I think it is hard to compare as NJ does not have the same percentage of outdoor people as Vermont does. Nor does it have the MTB tourism. That being said, I do think NJ trails are worthy of tourism. However, there is more to tourism than good trails.There are tons of studies out there regarding success of a non-profit, and compensated staff is always among the greatest impacts. Example: New Jersey has somewhere over 8.8 million people. Vermont has over 600k, or around 7% of NJ's population. JORBA has ~600 members, VMBA has ~7500 members. So JORBA has 8% of VMBA's members, while VT has 7% of NJ's population. How can it be so far off? I understand that this is not exactly an apples to apples comparison regarding focus on outdoor experience/education and green space availability, among other things, but the comparison is pretty striking.
No matter how you compare the two states though, we can be certain that we have some huge factor more mountain bikers living and riding here than VT does. One can argue tourism, seasonal visits, etc., help to increase VMBA's numbers, but over 11 times the amount?
I tend to agree with this myself. However, Art and I have had some recent success with our relationship with certain members of NYNJTC. I can not say that we are in the clear, because there still are some old school haters in that group that are still involved on the volunteer management level, but things have greatly improved. I also get the feeling that the paid management understands that inclusive brings more members. Art and I are supervisors for NYNJTC and this so far has strengthened the relationship between the two groups and made the relationship with the park better. It's not perfect, but much better than before. Perhaps we should push for Jorba recognition, but at this point we have not felt like rocking the boat. Perhaps the new blood will do that. By the way, our supervisor position is always open for new blood if anyone is interested. Personally, I hate having to fill out all those forms for the TC every 6 months, but we could not let this opportunity to work together pass.in reflection, as in my own experience, I haven't been successful with MCPC, NYNJTC, NJDEP...etc.
While I would not expect to see any mention of JORBA on the NYNJTC membership flyer, it is disappointing that we are not listed as a partner or member organization on their website. Its not for lack of trying, from a number of us.
Maybe we need more advocates, new, fresh with optimism, resilient and with good social skills.
I could be a little off with this answer, but I think a good portion of mebership funds goes to insurance, which is not something Jorba wants to use as a selling point, but essential if we want to work on trails. The perceived risk of mountain bikers may be part of the reason NYNJTC is hesitant to advertise their partnership with Jorba.
And combining these two, is there a difference in what JORBA and VMTB pays for insurance?I think it is hard to compare as NJ does not have the same percentage of outdoor people as Vermont does. Nor does it have the MTB tourism. That being said, I do think NJ trails are worthy of tourism. However, there is more to tourism than good trails.