I'm considering a modern geometry trail 27.5 hardtail as my backup bike. 2001 XC hardtail just isn't cutting it anywhere but 6MR and LewMo anymore for me. Transition Throttle is drool-worthy but since this is a backup bike, i may need to go with something a little less flashy. Honzo is on the list, but what else should i look at? Problem is it's hard to find a 27.5 non-plus hardtail these days. If i get a plus bike and change it to non-plus, does that screw up the geometry, bb height, ride quality, etc. that much? I also don't want anything super crazy slack since this will be a NJ rocky tech bike.
Try an sb150. May not climb like a scalpel but it is definitely a great climber and will shred the rest of the mountain going down. I came off a 27.5 trigger too and its night and dayThe problem with @UtahJoe is that he wants a 170mm travel trail bike that's as light and climbs like his scalpel.
Can't have your cake and eat it too! ?
As a 26" guy who just recently added a 27.5 trail bike to the stable, i just can't see me enjoying a 29er when i have to switch back and forth between 3 wheel sizes. Tire and emergency backup tube sharing is another reason i want to stay 27.5. I just feel it would be too annoying switching back and forth. i dunno, i'll see what's out there.I can't help you too much in terms of picking a 27.5 hardtail. Maybe a nukeproof scout 275. But I will say be careful trying to downsize wheel size on modern bikes. The BBs are pretty low to begin with on some newer bikes. I tried to run 27.5 plus wheels on my 29er and it was a failure. They weren't even that much smaller than the 29ers but I still didn't like the BB drop that came with them.
I have a 29" hardtail and like it a lot. A friend I ride with has a steel Honzo, also 29er and seems to like it alot. A 29" hardtail might surprise you. Mine is pretty playful. Doesn't feel as "wagon-wheelish" as it looks.
As a 26" guy who just recently added a 27.5 trail bike to the stable, i just can't see me enjoying a 29er when i have to switch back and forth between 3 wheel sizes. Tire and emergency backup tube sharing is another reason i want to stay 27.5. I just feel it would be too annoying switching back and forth. i dunno, I'll see what's out there.
What is this front and rear?Got to my testing grounds.
My opinions and mine only.
Mullet Bike all party out back with WTF up front. This is probably due to not riding any new geos of todays offerings. My last long travel trail bike was a 2007 nomad and the rear VPP is light years from then. I loved everything about the performance of how this version just plain works. What I cared and wanted to test was the climbing abilities in steep and technical. In the old nomad I always felt like every pedal stroke I was blowing through full travel of the rear, not so with this. The rear stayed planted Always! On the down it soaked both big and small hits as expected. I was always a believer that a suspension lockout is a default of poor suspension design but not here, I could see if I was living in an area where I had 5 mile jeep road climb to get to the 12 mile DH then it would be welcomed, otherwise I wouldn't use it.
Now for the dislikes. Everything with the front cockpit. Bars were too wide and more the anything too straight. I was in wrist pain for most of the ride. These bars would go off immediately and swap for some rise and sweep. Neck pain was also evident so not sure if sweep would help or maybe bike size was too big. Always a large but maybe with the new geo I need a medium. I played with saddle but did not help.
Now to what I hated, Utah is correct with the fork, it in no ways could I get the fork to work for me to match the rear. I brought the pump and clicks here and there to try and fine tune, it was too harsh to extremely harsh period. This fork would not be one I would match with that rear. The only place it worked was really big hits but small to medium bump performance was non existent. Now I need to see how fox plays with these long travel bikes as I do like the fact of having a ride for both parks and trails.
I will skip the 2nd test ride tonight as I dont want to go through that pain again. But this has got the juices flowing to test more long travel trail bikes to compare but man this bikes party side was a pure winner!!
View attachment 107703View attachment 107704View attachment 107705
thank you so much @jdog and Halters!!!
150 fork, 140 shockWhat is this front and rear?
What BDA saysWhat is this front and rear?
Many 🙂@mattybfat what other bike will you be taking for a ride after the Hightower?
Got to my testing grounds.
My opinions and mine only.
Mullet Bike all party out back with WTF up front. This is probably due to not riding any new geos of todays offerings. My last long travel trail bike was a 2007 nomad and the rear VPP is light years from then. I loved everything about the performance of how this version just plain works. What I cared and wanted to test was the climbing abilities in steep and technical. In the old nomad I always felt like every pedal stroke I was blowing through full travel of the rear, not so with this. The rear stayed planted Always! On the down it soaked both big and small hits as expected. I was always a believer that a suspension lockout is a default of poor suspension design but not here, I could see if I was living in an area where I had 5 mile jeep road climb to get to the 12 mile DH then it would be welcomed, otherwise I wouldn't use it.
Now for the dislikes. Everything with the front cockpit. Bars were too wide and more the anything too straight. I was in wrist pain for most of the ride. These bars would go off immediately and swap for some rise and sweep. Neck pain was also evident so not sure if sweep would help or maybe bike size was too big. Always a large but maybe with the new geo I need a medium. I played with saddle but did not help.
Now to what I hated, Utah is correct with the fork, it in no ways could I get the fork to work for me to match the rear. I brought the pump and clicks here and there to try and fine tune, it was too harsh to extremely harsh period. This fork would not be one I would match with that rear. The only place it worked was really big hits but small to medium bump performance was non existent. Now I need to see how fox plays with these long travel bikes as I do like the fact of having a ride for both parks and trails.
I will skip the 2nd test ride tonight as I dont want to go through that pain again. But this has got the juices flowing to test more long travel trail bikes to compare but man this bikes party side was a pure winner!!
View attachment 107703View attachment 107704View attachment 107705
thank you so much @jdog and Halters!!!
In general, does it make sense to lug around that bike if you aren’t going to totally rip DH? I understand that a current 150/140 rides like a 120 bike of yesterday year, but it sounds to be like you would be better suited on a blur. Mainly since, while they can “climb” you are setting land speed records in the bigger bikes where in the blur, probably would be..It was my turn on the hightower this evening. Having a tallboy, sitting on the bike felt very familiar.
Pedaling out of the lot was also a nothing new. I tried hopping around the lot a bit, and there was
plenty of bounce, but as soon as we started climbing, there was no bobbing at all. pedaling was smooth
and almost effortless - bike tracked straight and true for me.
went through the first uphill rock garden without a problem - even had to stall/adjust/restart - no problem.
This one is equipped with gx eagle, my tallboy is xo1 11sp. I tried out the dinner plate a couple times.
crazy rpms, but up ya go.
i suck at going dh fast, but this bike just eats it up. where i'd be brake checking, i just let it roll. wouldn't do that
on the tb in 29r mode.
yeah - i feel a AXS hightower in my future. only one problem...i gotta sell a bunch of stuff!
I gonna try the Bronson next me thinks but will try the 5010. I first need to figure out if I am large or medium santa cruz rider now (was large but I am shrinking). As I mentioned to @jdog I was a SC fanboy from the beginning, first bike was the tazmon, who here remembers that. That was the precursor to the heckler which I owned 2 and a super8 and a nomad. The nomad was the end because SC customers service went into the shitter. Seems like they fixed that problem to being the best now....@mattybfat when are you riding the 5010
How tall are you?I gonna try the Bronson next me thinks but will try the 5010. I first need to figure out if I am large or medium santa cruz rider now (was large but I am shrinking). As I mentioned to @jdog I was a SC fanboy from the beginning, first bike was the tazmon, who here remembers that. That was the precursor to the heckler which I owned 2 and a super8 and a nomad. The nomad was the end because SC customers service went into the shitter. Seems like they fixed that problem to being the best now....
In general, does it make sense to lug around that bike if you aren’t going to totally rip DH? I understand that a current 150/140 rides like a 120 bike of yesterday year, but it sounds to be like you would be better suited on a blur. Mainly since, while they can “climb” you are setting land speed records in the bigger bikes where in the blur, probably would be..
also, from experience with my 5010, the setup of the year largely affects the fork movement. I recently did bearing replacement and just like that, my fork is way more active.
@mattybfat when are you riding the 5010?