Fogerson
Former Resident Nerd
You may be right. I can't remember if my frame has a little tab near the dropout that could be replaced with a hanger. I may be thinking of my old Mary.
It doesn't and you probably are...
You may be right. I can't remember if my frame has a little tab near the dropout that could be replaced with a hanger. I may be thinking of my old Mary.
Wheels, fork, etc. would have to be the same.
Another KVSP preride today, this time with gears:
http://connect.garmin.com/activity/8329355
A different loop, something close to the race loop. Maybe not exact but it looks right. Should do the trick for those who want to follow that course.
I missed the SS today. I just don't have the confidence in this bike and I'm not sure why. This is more than an SS vs. gears thing. The SS is just setup better for me. It feels more stable, I ride faster, it doesn't seem twitchy. I need to figure out what the difference is sooner than later. It may be the tires. I rode last year's lap on Tuesday at 12.6 mph. Today was 11.9 on the new lap. No, it's not the same. But the trails are similar everywhere and the vertical/lap is just about the same.
Speaking of tires, the Python got a pinch flat today. Yes, I run it tubeless. The stans stuff was basically gone so it couldn't patch it up. But the Python has torn and flatted on me a good 4-5 times now, and I think I'm going to move on to the Geax for the geared bike as well to see if that helps.
I have Ergons on the SS, and foam cup holders on the geared bike. Does that make a difference? One thing I notice is that the geared bike wants to throw the handlebars left and right when I hit rocks, so it feels to me I'm making more of an effort to keep the wheels straight when I'm in the rocks at KVSP. If anyone has ideas, I'm all ears.
The stem on the SS has more of a rise. Aside from that, the fork, wheels, cranks, seat post, and bars are the same on both bikes. The geared bike is far too nice of a ride to give it up. But I need to address this soon.
For now, I'm showing up Sunday with the SS and dealing with the field sections like a hamster in a cage. If there's a sprint to the finish, I'll just have to either accept it and let the guy go or push him into the rock wall.
It'd be easier for Norm to borrow somebody's Air9 for the geared Niner steel v scandium comparo...
If you like the One9, you should just punt and buy an Air9 if you want a geared race bike. Except for the seat post, and maybe the front der, everything should swap right over from your SIR9. Sell the SIR9 and in all it'd be a $500 (maybe less) "upgrade".
The SIR9 isn't *really* a XC race bike...
...it seems like it makes one for you mentally...which is valid too.
Well, the forks are the same, right? F29?
So other than the frame, the only *big* difference is the wheels between Norm's SIR9 and One9.
How are you forks set up on each bike? Both the same pressure? Same rebound setting? Or if you have an RLC, same compression setting? One thing that took me a solid month to get just right on my paragon was the fork settings. Fox's setting for my weight were totally awful, IMO. I starting bring my shock pump with me and adjusting it.
How about your front tire pressure? same?
I honestly have no idea about the forks. Each seems to be entirely different from the other. The dials seem to have different ranges. I don't get on one bike and think the front end feels softer/stiffer than the other. I just ride, and pay little attention to them, to be honest.
PSI was 23-ish on the SS, 24-ish today until a blew out the rear tire. Then I put a tube in and blew it way up because I didn't want a pinch flat. The ride suffered because of that because I felt like I was getting on a pogo stick/jack hammer. I took that into account, the front still felt wrong.
Is the reach from the back of the saddle to the center of the bar the same on both bikes?
The front end stability difference could easily be down to more/less forward weight bias on one bike. And I'm sure the Geax vs. Hutch has some palpable impact as well.
I doubt it's the frame material difference.
The SIR has slightly more relaxed geometry, but it's still no beach cruiser. There's no way that the geometry of that frame is holding you back, IMO.
I doubt it's the frame material difference.
The SIR has slightly more relaxed geometry, but it's still no beach cruiser. There's no way that the geometry of that frame is holding you back, IMO.
Does the SS have an EBB? If so, your BB drop may be more and weight lower on the bike...
-Jim.
I think the tires play *some* role, I just have no idea how much. The Geax tires do weigh more, which could actually help with stability. Joe was certainly on to something as well. When I went out to measure them, the SS has a pretty stiff fork, almost rigid with a bit of cushion. The geared bike is basically pudding. That plus the tires is an obvious first step to explore.
I may have a job now, but I'm not at a point to start pissing money away on bike stuff myself....yet...so get to it! 😀
They both do, actually. If I start measuring relative EBB rotation angles Ben may come to my house and literally kill me.
But....it's something else to consider 😉
Did I mention I bought these today?
http://www.mtbnj.com/forum/showthread.php?t=7947
If I start measuring relative EBB rotation angles Ben may come to my house and literally kill me.
Did I mention I bought these today?
http://www.mtbnj.com/forum/showthread.php?t=7947
God, I hope you haven't overlooked something like the EBB rotation angle. Niner suggests a 6 o'clock position but I run mine at 12. I prefer the higher BB and better pedal/bashgaurd clearance. It is one aspect of a 29er that I really like. More clearance...Clarence!
you better not be serious and still be thinking about those 105 cranks.